Study purpose
- The aim of the study should be clearly stated.
Sample
- The sample should accurately reflect the population from which it is drawn.
- The source of the sample should be stated.
- The sampling method should be described and the sample size should be justified.
- Entry criteria and exclusions should be stated and justified.
- The number of patients lost to follow up should be stated and explanations given.
Control group
- The control group should be easily identifiable.
- The source of the controls should be explained—are they from the same population as the sample?
- Are the controls matched or randomised—to minimise bias and confounding.
Quality of measurements and outcomes
- Validity—are the measurements used regarded as valid by other investigators?
- Reproducibility—can the results be repeated or is there a reason to suspect they may be a “one off”? Blinded—were the investigators or subjects aware of their subject/control allocation?
- Quality control—has the methodology been rigorously adhered to?
Completeness
- Compliance—did all patients comply with the study?
- Drop outs—how many failed to complete the study?
- Deaths
- Missing data—how much are unavailable and why?
Distorting influences
- Extraneous treatments—other interventions that may have affected some but not all of the subjects.
- Confounding factors—Are there other variables that might influence the results?
- Appropriate analysis—Have appropriate statistical tests been used?
Validity
- All studies should be internally valid. That is, the conclusions can be logically drawn from the results produced by an appropriatemethodology.Forastudytoberegardedasvalid it must be shown that it has indeed demonstrated what it says it has. A study that is not internally valid should not be published because the findings cannot be accepted.
- The question of external validity relates to the value of the results of the study to other populations—that is, the generalisability of the results. For example, a study showing that 80% of the Swedish population has blond hair, might be used to make a sensible prediction of the incidence of blond hair in other Scandinavian countries, but would be invalid if applied to most other populations.
ref. Emerg Med J 2003;20:54-60
'EPIDEMIOLIGY > 추가자료 및 학습' 카테고리의 다른 글
어린이 건강과 환경을 위한 지침서 (0) | 2022.03.05 |
---|---|
환경호르몬 (0) | 2021.07.16 |
WHO 어린이 건강과 환경을 위한 지침서 (0) | 2020.08.15 |
study design algorithm (0) | 2020.08.10 |
Observational research methods (0) | 2020.05.28 |